Overview

Developing public access trails that offer a spectacular shoreline experience without impacting wildlife is central to the Bay Trail's mission. Yet, many have asked: can we build a shoreline trail while protecting wildlife, sensitive habitat, and the natural environment?

This delicate balancing act has been the subject of continuing debate in the Bay Area and worldwide. Many resource managers and environmental advocates are concerned that the presence of humans (and their pets) on trails may be deleterious to shoreline wildlife. These concerns often lead to heated controversy and can sometimes create roadblocks for trail implementation. On the other end, policymakers are frustrated because there is little scientific data to support expressed concerns about the potential impacts of public access trails on wildlife.

To begin to find answers to these questions, the Bay Trail Project initiated a study to look at if and how recreational trail users impact shorebirds. The Wildlife & Public Access Study, launched in 1996, is being led by an independent research team. Specifically, the Study is examining the potential effects of non-motorized recreational trail use on the diversity, abundance, and behavior of shorebirds and waterfowl that use mudflat foraging habitat along the Bay Trail. The Study will build a foundation of statistically valid data that can begin to guide the development and management of trails in a manner that respects and protects wildlife.

 

Above: Observers counting birds at the Mountain View study plot. 
   

The research team has completed two years of field research, and preliminary findings based upon summary data are available. The preliminary findings indicate that the study functioned as designed and suggest that there is no general relationship between trail use and either bird abundance or overall species diversity in foraging habitat in the San Francisco Bay area. However, there are many caveats, and much more to learn from the detailed data sets and statistical analyses. The team will continue to enter the "raw" data and perform statistical analyses during the summer and fall of 2003, and a final report is expected to be available early in 2004. The Study has generated great and broad interest, and funds for a third year of research have already been secured by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) from the The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) through the Coastal Impact Assistance Program. The specific question for this next phase of research has not yet been defined. Many new questions have sprouted from the Study to date, and the final results are likely to uncover many more.


More studies will be needed to develop enough statistically valid data to fully address wildlife and public access in a scientific manner. While continuing the research and dialogue, trail and resource managers can utilize a variety of environmentally sound trail siting, design, and management practices. BCDC's Public Access and Wildlife Compatibility Report provides an excellent summary of these practices.

Left: An observer collects data at the Mountain View study plot.



Study Design & Research Question


The basic research question of the Wildlife and Public Access Study is "does trail use affect wildlife." The study more specifically asks, "what are the potential effects of non-motorized recreational trails on the diversity, abundance, and behavior of shorebirds and waterfowl that use mudflat foraging habitat adjacent to the Bay Trail."

After extensive field review, three locations were used for the study: Bothin Marsh in Mill Valley (Marin County), Redwood Shores (San Mateo County), and Shoreline at Mountain View (Santa Clara County) (see map at left). At each location, paired trail and non-trail (control) sites were selected and 100-foot by 100-foot study quads were set up. Paired sites were ecologically and physically similar; in each case, the sites were on levees adjacent to a tidal wetland where mudflats are exposed at low tide.

Data were collected for 24 months at paired sites in the three locations. Observations were made four times a month in four-hour observation periods simultaneously at both the trail and control sites, on two week days and two weekend days.

Left: Trail site locations.

Three types of data were collected at each site. The first compares the abundance and species diversity of shorebirds found at sites that have developed shoreline trails with those observed at similar undeveloped control sites. The second data set records shorebird behavioral responses to various types of trail users relative to behavior at undisturbed control sites. Finally, data are collected on the type and intensity of recreational use at the three locations.

For more details about the study questions and design, refer to the Wildlife and Public Access Study Proposed Research Plan Report and the Wildlife and Public Access Study Site Selection Report (see reports section).


Right: Researchers measure and set up study plots for observation.



Study Objectives

Through the Wildlife and Public Access Study, the Bay Trail Project hopes to accomplish the following general objectives:
  • Produce results that will inform future siting, implementation, and design decisions for the Bay Trail. 

  • Enrich the dialogue about wildlife and public access among trail planners, land owners and managers, resource agencies, planning agencies, environmental groups, bird organizations, and other interested parties. 

  • Provide a valuable study design that can be replicated by other agencies, trail planners, and conservation groups around the country.
Specifically, the Study will:
  • Generate statistically-testable data to determine the effects of trail users on the diversity and abundance of shorebirds in mudflat habitats adjacent to trails as compared to non-trail control sites.

  • Evaluate the effects that trail users have on the behavior of shorebirds in mudflat habitats.



Study Team

Principal Investigators:
Jana Sokale, Environmental Planner, Adjunct Faculty Member, San Jose State University

Dr. Lynne Trulio, Associate Professor and Chair, Department of Environmental Studies, San Jose State University

Site Supervisors:
Debra Chromczak (Mountian View)
Ingrid Harrald (Redwood Shores)
Lisa Hug (Mill Valley)
Sean Casto (Interim Supervisor, Redwood Shores)


Above: A researcher prepares for observation.
Observers:

Victoria Baker

Hazel Gibson

Susan O'Neil

Michelle Boone

Elaine Hards

Mike Perlmutter

Emily Brockman

Mark Homrighausen

Chrissy Piotrowski

Chris Brown

Esperanza Licad

Roni Rogers

Allison Busch

Bob Long

Nicole Salgado

Brandon Candelinia

David Luther

Arthur Salmon

Kelly Davidson Chou

Barbara Maximovich

Jan Talbert

Meta Dittmer

Melissa McCoy

Amy Upgren

Anthony Fisher

Carrie McCracken

Heather White

Harold Fukuma

Amy Morris

Pete Zavattero

Autumn Garrett

Adrienne Morrison

 




Reports & Links

Bay Trail Wildlife & Public Access Study Reports:

Wildlife and Public Access Study Proposed Research Plan (October 1996) (COMING SOON!)
Wildlife and Public Access Study Site Selection Report (July 1998) (COMING SOON!)
Spring/Summer 2001 Semi-Annual Report (October 2001) (PDF, 109KB)
Preliminary Findings: 2 Years of Field Research (September 2002) (PDF, 190KB)

Other Related Links:


BCDC's Balancing Public Access and Wildlife Resource Protection in San Francisco Bay
BCDC's Public Access and Wildlife Compatibility Report (March 2001) (PDF, 142KB)




Acknowledgments


Funders:
Bay Trail Project
California Coastal Conservancy
California Trails and Greenways Foundation
Cargill Salt Company
East Bay Regional Park District
National Park Service
Oracle Corporation
Vandenberg/Lipton
Varian Foundation
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District

Assistance in establishing study sites:
Joy Albertson, US Fish and Wildlife Service
David Hansen, Marin Open Space District
Lori Johnson, Cargill Salt Company
Glenn Lyles, City of Mountain View
Teresa Le Blanc, California Department of Fish and Game
Clyde Morris, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Stephen Petterle, Marin Open Space District
Jill Singleton, Cargill Salt Company (now at EBRPD)
Chuck Taylor, Cargill Salt Company
Peter Vorametsanti, Redwood City

Technical assistance*:

Shannon Bros, San Jose State University
John Geibel, Department of Fish and Game
Philip Law, Department of Fish and Game
Rick Parmer, Department of Fish and Game
Lynne Stenzel, Point Reyes Bird Observatory

* technical assistance in designing study, developing data collection forms and statistical tests, and evaluating statistical findings




Contact

For more information about the Wildlife & Public Access Study, contact Ceil Scandone at 510/464-7961.



Home | About Bay Trail | Maps & Virtual Tour | Projects & Publications | Bay Trail Store | Links | Contact

Copyright © ABAG
4/01//03 mb  All rights reserved
(510) 464-7900
webmaster@abag.ca.gov