HOUSING

  1. Background
  2. Subregional Issues
  3. Subregional Policies

{Sonoma County Subregion Issues and Policies}

BACKGROUND

The Subregion has experienced significant growth in population and households during recent decades and housing demand will likely continue to be high, given the attractive quality of life to be found here. In addition, there is a growing awareness of the critical importance of an adequate supply of housing to achieving a healthy economic climate. For the Subregion, as well as the state and region, continued economic vitality requires a full range of affordable and available housing within a reasonable distance of employment opportunities.

In many ways, the housing market operates at a subregional, rather than a strictly local, level. In light of this, and given the fiscal disincentives for local governments that are often associated with residential development, there are benefits to a subregional approach to addressing housing issues.


SUBREGIONAL ISSUES

The following are issues relating to the provision of housing that would benefit from being addressed cooperatively by the Jurisdictions and/or for which local actions have subregional effects. These Subregional Issues are:

How to:

  1. Ensure an adequate supply of housing to serve the existing and future needs of the Subregion, including the needs of large families, seniors, and others with special housing needs.

  2. Promote housing that is affordable to the full spectrum of present and expected residents of the Subregion.

  3. Improve state and federal legal requirements on local governments with regard to planning for, and providing, housing.
  4. Protect, preserve and invest in existing residential areas, especially those providing affordable or moderately-priced housing.


SUBREGIONAL POLICIES

  1. Housing supply, including special needs groups

    • The Jurisdictions should create a subregional committee or task force to promote housing for very low, low and moderate-income households and for people with special needs, through inter-jurisdictional participation and public/private partnerships. Examples of possible activities include: subregional programs to establish a housing data base, co-sponsored joint development projects (especially for affordable or special needs housing), legislative advocacy, and public education and information.

    • The Jurisdictions should coordinate local efforts to designate and fund jointly the development of specific sites, including vacant buildings, for the provision of temporary housing needs, such as homeless shelters, transitional housing, and housing for seasonal workers.

    • The Jurisdictions should continue coordinated public/private partnerships to ensure mutual understanding of subregional housing needs and the practices and needs and the practices and needs of the development community, and to develop ways to improve housing production and lower housing costs.

    • Each Jurisdiction should encourage the provision of special needs housing, including community care facilities for seniors, mentally or physically disabled, and children, in residential and mixed use areas and especially near transit and services.

    • Each Jurisdiction should consider streamlining processing for second units in urban areas.

    • Each Jurisdiction should encourage mixed use development and multiple family housing in appropriate locations, especially near commercial and civic uses and in areas with existing or planned transit.

    • To meet a variety of housing needs and varied levels of affordability, each Jurisdiction should encourage a range of unit sizes and types and lot designs in new residential developments.

    • Each Jurisdiction should encourage new residential developments to include units and facilities to accommodate households with children and seniors.

    • Each Jurisdiction should establish incentives and design guidelines for residential uses above ground floor commercial uses.

    • Each Jurisdiction should consider adopting minimum, as well as maximum, densities within all residential planning and zoning categories to prevent under-utilization of residential sites.

    • Each Jurisdiction should consider rezoning in order to increase residential densities in appropriate locations, especially in areas with superior existing or planning transit service, while protecting the quality of life in the "upzoned" area.

    • Each Jurisdiction should consider a policy that would maintain the overall residential capacity and mix of unit types, consistent with the Jurisdiction's adopted general plan and its ability to provide services.

    • Each Jurisdiction should encourage that development projects over a certain size occur at or above the midpoint of the applicable density range.

    • Each Jurisdiction should promote opportunities for people to live and work in the same community.

  2. Housing Affordability

    • Each Jurisdiction should consider exemptions from certain requirements (e.g., zoning ordinance provisions, subdivision standards and growth management programs) for housing affordable to lower income households and projects providing an established minimum percentage of affordable units, based on goals established by each Jurisdiction.

    • The Jurisdictions should explore joint financing possibilities to provide lower-cost loans for the purchase, rehabilitation and/or new construction of affordable housing.

    • Each Jurisdiction should encourage innovation in housing design and construction practices which might lower costs (e.g., manufactured housing).

    • Each Jurisdiction should actively pursue redevelopment projects and spend lower and moderate-income housing funds generated by such projects.

    • Each Jurisdiction should identify and consider making available vacant publicly-owned sites and buildings for the development of affordable housing and or mixed use.

    • Each Jurisdiction should establish an "inclusionary" program to ensure the provision of affordable housing through either on- or off-site construction payment of in-lieu fees or other means. The Jurisdictions should consider adopting a standardization subregional inclusionary program, which could help to "level the playing field" throughout the Subregion.

    • The Jurisdictions should work with employers to develop partnerships and/or programs to make housing affordable to their workers. Actions might include encouraging employers to facilitate housing availability and affordability for their workers by providing building sites, funding, or the provision of residential units. Incentives for such participation might include faster processing for building permits, fee waivers, etc.

  3. Improved state and federal legal requirements regarding planning for, and providing, housing

    • The Jurisdictions should support a cooperative process to distribute subregional housing allocations, and advocate for changes in state law to allow for the development of subregionally-generated housing needs allocations.

  4. Protecting and preserving existing residential areas

    • Each Jurisdiction should identify and implement steps needed to preserve existing affordable housing.

    • Each Jurisdiction should promote programs that provide replacement housing when residential units are lost or destroyed. Each Jurisdiction should require that replacement housing be constructed so as to avoid natural hazards.



Location and Intensity of Urban DevelopmentBack to our Web SiteSubregional PlanningSearchContact Us !Mobility

Copyright © 1995-1998 ABAG.  All rights reserved.
cl 07/14/99